Review of Lt
Lt
Wendy Riggs

Associate Professor of Biology

College of the Redwoods, United States of America

Used Lt monthly for 1-2 years

Oct 2023

I love it. But like any tech tool, it can be tricky to get up and running. There is also a learning curve for students, so it can be rather high maintenance to use. I don't have many colleagues who use it, even though we have all the stuff.

Reply from Lt:Thank you for your insights Wendy! We're looking at how we can improve the onboarding process in the product so that it's easier to get started straight away. We're really glad that Lt makes your teaching more efficient and supports positive lab experiences for your students.
Wendy Riggs found Lt:
  • Significantly reduces teacher workload
    I can build lab activities, and then reuse them semester by semester.
  • Moderately improves teaching efficiency
    Edits/improvements I make to the activities impact all students moving forward. As I figure out better ways to do something, I can add a note about that into the LT activity. Super efficient!
  • Slightly improves attainment
    I'm assuming attainment means student retention (they stay in the class)? I don't think it has much of an impact, but LT does make me feel like I can offer MUCH more robust lab experiences for my online students.
  • Significantly builds student knowledge
    The activities are varied and can give students lots of opportunities to practice what they are learning. I love that!
flag
SHARE:
Share on Linked In

About EdTech Impact

We've been evaluating the EdTech marketplace since 2019, empowering educators to make informed decisions, and to help providers increase the quality of their products.

Read more about our mission, our quality framework and reviewer guidelines to learn how we keep EdTech Impact a collaborative and trustworthy place for everyone.